Blogs

Recommendations for Electronically Stored Information Protocol

A protocol was recently released by the Joint Electronic Technology Working Group that sets forth best practices for the efficient and cost-effective management of post-indictment discovery of electronically stored information -- otherwise known as ESI.  These recommendations include a framework for the handling of digitized or electronic discovery in a federal criminal case.  Because of the prevalence of ESI discovery in many federal criminal cases, the protocol is a must-read for all practitioners in federal criminal cases. To read the full ESI Protocol, please see Law - Discovery.

Model Jury Instruction Regarding Social Media, Smart Phones, and the Like

In mid-August 2012, the federal judiciary released the model jury instruction below to address the growing problem of juror use of social media, smart phones, and the like in conjunction with or before deliberations in a case.  This model jury instruction can be used in both civil and criminal cases. To see the full jury instruction, please see our link under Law - Trials. 

Supreme Court Expands Jurisprudence for Juveniles in Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs

On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court expanded its jurisprudence in the area of sentencing law applicable to juveniles by holding that mandatory terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole violate the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution.  To see the Court's full opinion, please see our link under Law – Case Law – US Supreme Court.

Supreme Court to Review Private Citizens’ Right to Challenge Changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

On May 21, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to review a jurisdictional issue (standing) regarding the right of private citizens to challenge some of the changes made to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the last presidential administration. The challenges concern the ability of the government to carry out electronic surveillance, and are based on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. To read more about this, please see our link under Law – Case Law – US Supreme Court.

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Defendants Who Meet Career Offender Criteria Can Benefit from the FSA Sentencing Guidelines

On May 8, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remanded for resentencing the case of United States v. Jackson because of the new sentencing guidelines promulgated as a result of the Fair Sentencing Act, which President Obama signed into law on August 3, 2010. The opinion for the first time clarifies that defendants who meet career offender criteria can nevertheless benefit from the lower sentencing ranges embodied in the new sentencing guidelines.  To read more about this, please see our link under Law – Case Law – Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

How is the FSA Applied to Crack-Related Crimes Before and After August 3, 2010?

On April 17, 2012, the Supreme Court heard arguments in United States v. Dorsey and United States v. Hill.  The defendants in these cases were sentenced for committing crack cocaine trafficking violations prior to the effective date of the Fair Sentencing Act.  The issue in these cases is whether the FSA applies to defendants who committed crack-related crimes before August 3, 2010 but are sentenced after this effective date of the FSA.  To read more about this, please see our link under Law – Case Law – US Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Affirms Broad Authority of Corrections Officials to Conduct Strip Searches

On April 2, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington in which it examined the constitutional limitations on searches conducted by corrections officers of new inmates at a jail or prison. In Florence, the Court affirmed earlier case law in which it held that corrections officers are permitted to devise reasonable search policies to detect and deter the possession of contraband in correctional facilities.

US Supreme Court Ruling -- Standards of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Apply to Plea Bargaining Stage of a Case

On March 21, 2012, the Supreme Court decided two cases in which it found, by a 5-4 vote, that the standards of ineffective assistance of counsel (set forth earlier in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)) apply to the plea bargaining stage of a case.  In so holding, the Court found that counsel was ineffective when in one case (Lafler v.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - blogs